@JohnNoonan I bought three actually

@jacobrelkin the speed of light is a bitch

@DarioSolera yes we order by score, random to ensure every answer has a fair shot. Disabled for Google and pagination.

@migueldeicaza I reject your reality, and substitute my own!

@LostInTangent <brogue>ah, to find the O'Data at the end o' the rainbowwww!</brogue>

@LaceySnr unfortunately mechanical switch ergo keyboards are EXTREMELY rare. Expensive, ebay sorts of affairs. http://geekhack.org

@jzy NINJAS

@Carnage4Life it's based on the same stuff YouTube uses to detect content. And that works insanely well. http://goo.gl/7fhw

@lizardbill @jzy I like it, but I am not sure it would fly..

@kevindente be the change you want to see, man

@sidecut I predicted surprise. And there was, even in that review. Not sure why this is so hard to understand..

@rjstelling typing on it is horrible though, from every review I've read. Kind of a boner shrinker.

@colfaxschuyler http://careers.stackoverflow.com isn't enough?

@BillB No way I'm arguing with Bill Budge, one of my heroes -- see bottom of this post :) http://goo.gl/oTCw

@glenatron double-edged sword: makes it easier to have new blood, but also tends to negate experience

@jongalloway dang now I have to buy a copy.

@stevetranby it's all @jzy 's hard work!

@noelsequeira it is our deeply held belief that expert communities can *only* form around shared love of a topic

@migueldeicaza it's windy today. there will be leaves.

@troygilbert policy is at http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/defending-attribution-required/

@lylo http://programmers.stackexchange.com/faq

@d1k_is http://programmers.stackexchange.com/faq

@avi4now see http://programmers.stackexchange.com/faq

@plukevdh see http://programmers.stackexchange.com/faq

@subdigital people complain there's not enough beefy subjective questions over there, so, we are being the change we want to see

@glent we follow up with them as documented in http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/defending-attribution-required/

@jzy zombie apocalypse probably

@WaterlooAlex indeed! still a mystery why google indexed the homepage WITH THAT QUESTION ON IT (cached) but not the question page itself.

@CVertex see http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/defending-attribution-required/

@shawn_hamman I'll see it. What other reason does there need to be?

@shawn_hamman not a dupe; fixed typo, deleted within 30 seconds, resubmitted. Shrug. #whyhavedeleteifitdoesntwork

@FoleyIsGood trust me: if that was it, I would be as quiet as a mouse. This is plain ol' browsing, nothing weird.

@mcanti it's mostly because running a small business takes a lot of time

@mattcutts we would of course be honored if you popped by at any time. I'm a big fan of yours.

@edbott didn't sound so explosive to me; sounded like he was reading a statement he had prepared in advance

@ethicalsean well, you can configure firefox to submit searches to http://stackexchange.com/search/q=[query] if you like

@ethicalsean why a firefox add-in when a URL will do? http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/10/search-all-stack-exchange-sites/

@mattcutts we're doing our part to reach webmasters as well (and we participate too!): http://webmasters.stackexchange.com

@mrdenny lol

@thepocketwade I have killed for less

@riduidel it does see http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/09/announcer-booster-and-publicist-badges/

@anildash I don't think there's any agreement from the actual MSFT community that Ozzie was DOING anything; I concur -- nada

@rexm I agree completely, but the "use IRC, idiots" crowd is really REALLY vocal (though I suspect small)

@Encosia no, flash is disabled for me -- this is pure JS

@portman_wills I find I listen less with video; the video distracts from the audio

@williamsonj you may be interested in ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tieA5wfcgH4

@kfriedson screenshare is different, I mean just video of someone's face that you're talking. I agree screenshare is great!

@BoltClock myrep += 10000; yourrep -= 10000; // when you can't win, cheat

@seesharp the Great Wine Catastrophe of 2010

@badp listen to me talk about gaming on the herding code podcast http://herdingcode.com/?p=263

@Cyranix if you can dig up the links, post 'em as answers!

@wilshipley regret nothing, it's more than 99.999999% the world had

@haacked @jongalloway also, rubbing his bald head is good luck. Or so I heard.

@haacked creativity and being positive are overrated, anyways

@NathanBowers http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3W94GcAN6E

@jonathancoulton LA face with the Oakland booty!

@Jaykul only if you consider a job interview "working for free", I guess..

@leeked see http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/10/search-all-stack-exchange-sites/

@jimblanchard ah, sorry to bother. whatever time you have is appreciated; can you email me? jatwood@codinghorror.com

@dougrathbone we require and enforce (with followup) attribution as per http://goo.gl/00kW

@dougrathbone but it is correct, they rank much lower http://imgur.com/Jn2vV.png

@jimblanchard can you test logging in and out via openid on sf, so, and a few stackexchange.com sites? getting reports that /auth is blocked

@donpark I see now how your mental models of programming work :)

@donpark feel free to ask us, we know everything about it, and have all the arrows in our back to prove it too

@jimblanchard good to know, thank you!

@jimblanchard it's the http://stackexchange.com/sites network that is of concern, not necessarily SO proper

@erator you shouldn't, but there are caveats. see http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/09/global-network-auto-login/

@Daemin it's true on every site in our network. gaming has 263,595 google, 729 search, 329 bing, 278 yahoo.

@Daemin that was from http://webapps.stackexchange.com

@NathanBowers jin's is always up

@NathanBowers that reminds me, I need some iressa.

@mrdenny that's pretty standard.. http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/11/speed-still-matters.html

@senfo so you want cooking.stackexchange.com search results mixed with your bicycles.stackexchange.com search results?

@senfo no it doesnt: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/10/search-all-stack-exchange-sites/

@kevindente I support these activities. Leave breadcrumb trails of your awesome for others to find.

@senfo yes, the whole web should be one giant site. You truly "get" the web!

@Ricket @spolsky we also ran out of pedants! oh wait no we didn't! :)

@kevindente it does when you have 3 monitors and the taskbar is active on each

@benoror see http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/10/domain-names-the-wrong-question/

@lhahne see http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/10/domain-names-the-wrong-question/

@NathanBowers bluray is a fail. Apple and Microsoft both agree on this one. So do I.

@saraford YER GOIN DOWN FORD! :)

@jarrod_dixon NOW GET HOME AND GET TO WORK

@davidlantner doesn't matter if it's in HTML; if Google says it's in there, it is. They are 90% of our traffic.

@robinweston how's that hamstring coming along?

@timbray maybe they thought it was the line to the restroom?

@averyj my humility goes to 11... bitch!

@RockBandAide now if only MOAR MUSE!

@mrdenny no kindle3? FAIL! get one! it's awesome, I recommend it without reservation. at only $139, no brainer.

@CMastication only this http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2005/08/why-estimate-when-you-can-measure.html

@miguelcarrasco @accordionguy cats regularly live ~15 years. Windows XP is not even 10 years old. #imjustsayin

@jzy AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

@po8crg very cool, I had NOT seen that..

@rolfje thanks.

@rolfje you know what's really polite? not wasting my time with a meaningless "thanks!" email. Yeah.

@donpark damn right -- beatings!

@saturn825 it does, in person -- but different communication mediums have different needs

@discoposse awesome, lol

@SteveDinn ah, so you're proudly part of the problem? awesome :)

@averyj congrats!!